Trusted Family Law Attorney in Salt Lake City, Utah | Divorce Attorney Eric K. Johnson
Utah Divorce Resource
Divorce and Family Law by Eric K. Johnson, Attorney At Law
Eric K. Johnson, Attorney
Utah Family Law, LC
Direct Dial to Eric 801-450-0183 - Office: 801-466-9277
eric@divorceutah.com
Utah Family Law

Posted by eric_k_johnson on July 3, 2012


The Best Interest of the Child Standard is Neither a Standard Nor Does It Serve the Best Interest of the Child

What “interest” is the best interest of the child? Clearly the best legal and equitable interest, as that is the extent of the court’s authority.  An order made in the best interest of the child requires that the child’s best interest first be determined.

Court orders in Utah divorce child custody disputes must satisfy the “best interest of the child” standard.  It’s not what you think.

Applying “the best interest” of the child” as the standard a court’s child custody orders must meet necessarily means that the order “best” meets or—at least attempts to meet—the interest of a child as best the court can.  This thus requires the court to consider all possible orders it has the authority to impose and determine which order(s) “best” serve(s) the interest of a child.

This also necessarily means that the “best interest” standard is at least a “rational person” standard, if not an objective standard.

Ruling according to the best interest of the children means that a court is clearly prohibited from issuing a child custody order that serves the “sufficient,” “adequate,” minimal, or even “worst interest” of a child.

Holding the court to a standard by which its orders must meet the “best” interest of the child means that the court must—following studious, sincere analysis of all material, relevant evidence presented– issue an order it truly concludes serves best the interests of the child.  It means that the court cannot merely issue an order that is “good enough,” that “can’t hurt,” i.e., that adequately  serves the best interest of the child, yet that is precisely what most court orders pertaining to child custody are, and they are unapologetically so.  Courts get complacent, believing all divorces are so similar that a one size fits all presumption is just being efficient.   Lazy courts shamelessly justify this lax approach to the best interest analysis by calling such path-of-least-resistance decisions “efficient” and “guided by experience.”

One comment on “The Best Interest of the Child Standard is Neither a Standard Nor Does It Serve the Best Interest of the Child

  1. Rollerdad on said:

    Well said Eric. I wish I had a dollar for every time a misguided therapist involved in my child custody case made a recommendation “in the best interest of the child” that only continued to hurt my kids and line her own pockets with endless therapeutic visits. Boy was it satisfying when the judge finally saw what was happening and handed my ex that $5000 therapy bill. The kids haven’t been back since. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>