Appeal Archives

Fox v. Fox 2022 UT App 88 – alimony

Fox v. Fox 2022 UT App 88 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DIANN SHERI FOX, Appellant, v. BENJAMIN DAVIS FOX, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200949-CA Filed July 14, 2022 Fifth District Court, St. George Department The Honorable Matthew L. Bell No.…

Nix v. Nix – 2022 UT App 83- insufficient evidence of adultery

2022 UT App 83 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JILL NIX, Appellee, v. ROLAND COMPTON NIX JR., Appellant. Opinion No. 20200691-CA Filed June 30, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Darold J. McDade No. 174402122 Seth D. Needs,…

Horne v. Horne – 2022 UT App 54 – 60(b) motion to set aside

2022 UT App 54 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS REBECCA A. HORNE, Appellee, v. TODD D. HORNE, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200845-CA Filed April 28, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence No. 194905732 Mary C.…

Twitchell v. Twitchell – 2022 UT App 49 – child custody and support

April 18, 2022

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Best Interest of the Child, Child Custody, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Children in Divorce, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Domestic Violence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parent Time, Parental Fitness, Parenting Plan, Physical Custody, Preparing for Divorce, Procedure and Evidence, Sole Custody, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Visitation, Women's Divorce Issues

appeal, calculation, child custody, Child Support, child support obligation, conclusions of law, deviate, district court, divorce decree, Domestic Violence, evidence, findings of fact, income, moral character, neglect, Parent Time, physical abuse, physical custody, statutory minimum schedule, trial court, Utah Code § 30-3-10, Utah Code § 30-3-34, Utah Code § 30-3-35, Utah Code § 30-3-35.5, Utah Code § 78B-12-203, Utah Court of Appeals

Twitchell v. Twitchell – 2022 UT App 49 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAZMIN S. TWITCHELL, Appellee, V. JOSEPH N. TWITCHELL, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200546-CA Filed April 14, 2022 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Brian G. Cannell No.…

Widdison v. Widdison – 2022 UT App 46 – custody modification

April 13, 2022

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Best Interest of the Child, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Children in Divorce, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Domestic Relations Commissioners, Evidence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Joint Legal Custody, Joint Physical Custody, Judges, Justice and Equity, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Child Custody, Modification of Child Support, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Modification of Parent-time, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Motion Practice, Noncustodial parents, Parental Rights, Petition to Modify Decree of Divorce, Physical Custody, Procedure and Evidence, Sole Custody, Special Circumstances, Unwed Parents, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

best interest, best interests, discretion, Modification, Parent Time, physical custody, Relocation, stability, substantial and material change in circumstances, Utah Code § 30-3-10.1, Utah Code § 30-3-10.4, Utah Code § 30-3-34, Utah Code § 30-3-37, Utah Code §30-3-36

Widdison v. Widdison – 2022 UT App 46 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS NICOLE WIDDISON, Appellant, LEON BRYANT WIDDISON, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200484-CA Filed April 7, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Robert P. Faust No.…

Knowles v. Knowles – UT App 47

Knowles v. Knowles – UT App 47 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DUANE CROFT KNOWLES, Appellant, v. CELIA FERN KNOWLES, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200032 Filed April 7, 2022 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable David R. Hamilton No. 174700123 …

Erickson v. Erickson – 2022 UT App 27

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DEAN ERICKSON, Appellee, v. JANICE ERICKSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200193-CA Filed March 3, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Todd M. Shaughnessy No. 174901105 Albert N. Pranno, Attorney for Appellant Jordan M.…

Hillam v. Hillam – 2022 UT App 24 – final and appealable ruling, rule 54(b)

2022 UT App 24 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JOHN DINSDALE HILLAM, Petitioner, v. TARA HILLAM, Respondent and Appellant, v. DUSTIN HANCOCK AS INVESTMENT TRUSTEE, Respondent and Appellee. Opinion No. 20200545-CA Filed February 25, 2022 Second District Court, Farmington Department…

In re J.L… 2022 UT 12 – termination of parental rights

2022 UT 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, in the Interest of J.A.L. and J.O.L., Persons Under Eighteen Years of Age J.L. and J.A., Appellants, STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. No. 20200271 Heard September…

2022 UT App 15 – Miller v. DaSilva – protective order objections

February 10, 2022

Divorce Utah

Abuse, Appeal, Civil Stalking, Civil Stalking Injunction, Court Orders, Court Rules, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Domestic Relations Commissioners, Domestic Violence, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Protective Orders, Stalking, Stalking Injunction/Civil Stalking Injunction, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

§ 78B-7-604, § 78B-7-603, 10 days, 14 days, Chapter 7, cohabitant abuse, cohabitant abuse act, cohabitant abuse protective order, Cohabitant Abuse Protective Orders, commissioner, domestic abuse, ex parte protective order, hearing, Judicial Code, Part 6, petitioner, protective order, Protective Orders and Stalking Injunctions, recommendations, respondent, rule 108, Title 78B, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah R. Civ. P. 108(a), Utah R. Jud. Admin. 6-401, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure

2022 UT App 15 – Miller v. DaSilva http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/view.html?court=appopin&opinion=Miller v. Dasilva20220203_20200719_15.pdf THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LISA M. MILLER, Appellant, v. AMY ELIZABETH DASILVA, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200719-CA Filed February 3, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable…

Wadsworth v. Wadsworth – 2022 UT App 5 – marital estate

January 17, 2022

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Business Interests, Business Valuation, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Causes, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Equity, Evidence, Expert Witnesses, Extramarital affairs/Adultery, Family Law, Finances, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Husband's or Wife's Business, Infidelity, Judges, Justice and Equity, Lawyer Fees, Legal System, Marital Debts, Marital Estate, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Personal Property, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, Real Estate/Real Property, Spousal Support, Spouse's Business, Taxation, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Valuation, Women's Divorce Issues

appellate case, appellate decision, court of appeals, divorce law, family law, Utah Court of Appeals

2022 UT App 5 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS CANDI WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. GUY L. WADSWORTH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190106-CA No. 20200430-CA Filed January 13, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Su Chon No. 104904966 Michael D.…

T.W. v. S.A. – 2021 UT App 132 – child custody

January 14, 2022

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Amicable Divorce, Annulment of Marriage, Antenuptial Agreements, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Best Interest of the Child, Business Interests, Business Valuation, Child Abuse, Child Care Costs, Child Care/Surrogate Care, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Child Neglect, Child Protective Order, Child Protective Services, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Child Support Enforcement, Child Support Modification, Children in Divorce, Civil Stalking, Civil Stalking Injunction, Co-parenting, Cohabitation, Common Law Marriage, Contempt of Court, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custodial Interference, Custody, Custody Evaluation, Daycare, Debts, Dirty Tricks, Discovery, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS), Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Causes, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Utah, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

appellate courts, child custody, child custody arrangement, child custody award, court decisions, custody, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah law

2021 UT App 132 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS T.W., Appellant, v. S.A., Appellee. Opinion No. 20200397-CA Filed November 26, 2021 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Dianna Gibson No. 134401457 David Pedrazas, Attorney for Appellant Laja K.…

Fischer v. Fischer – 2021 UT App 145 – marital vs. separate property

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS GARY LEE FISCHER, Appellant, v. MELISSA KAY FISCHER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200557-CA Filed December 30, 2021 Seventh District Court, Moab Department The Honorable Don Torgerson No. 184700047 Steve S. Christensen and Clinton R. Brimhall, Attorneys…

2021 UT 33 – Gillman v. Gillman

July 28, 2021

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Justice and Equity, Motion Practice, Supreme Court Decisions, Utah, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law

default, default judgment, merits, motion to set aside, Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c), Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 56

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH BROOKELYN GILLMAN, CINDY MAUGHAN, CHANCELOR MAUGHAN, AND JOHN MAUGHAN, Appellants, v. GARY WALKER GILLMAN AND LANCE FINN GILLMAN, Appellees. No. 20190404 Heard November 9, 2020 Filed July 22, 2021 On…

Nakkina v. Mahanthi – 2021 UT App 63 – joint equal custody, marital property, attorney fees

July 2, 2021

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Best Interest of the Child, Child Custody, Children in Divorce, Co-parenting, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Divorce, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Equity, Evidence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Joint Physical Custody, Judges, Justice and Equity, Lawyer Fees, Legal System, Marital Estate, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parental Fitness, Parental Rights, Parenting Plan, Personal Property, Physical Custody, Preparing for Divorce, Property Division, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

attorney's fees award, interspousal gifts, joint equal physical custody, joint parent-time, joint physical custody, marital property, Nakkina v. Mahanthi - 2021 UT App 63, Utah Court of Appeals

Nakkina v. Mahanthi – 2021 UT App 63 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SIREESHA NAKKINA, Appellee, v. PRODEEP KUMAR MAHANTHI, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190750-CA Filed June 17, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence No.…

Ward v. McGarry – 2021 UT App 51

Ward v. McGarry – 2021 UT App 51 NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Court of Appeals of Utah. Sara WARD, Appellant, v. Meredith MCGARRY, Appellee. …

Do judges sometimes feel overburdened by the responsibilities of their job?

Yes, and for good reason. First, let me be unusually but sincerely candid: many judges and many of the actions that judges take disappoint me. There are some excellent judges on the bench who are clearly skilled in the law…

I suspect my husband fathered a child with someone else. Can I challenge our divorce ruling?

If I suspect my ex-husband fathered a child with someone else while we were married, can I challenge our divorce ruling? If, by this question, you mean that you are the wife; and you discovered, after you divorced, that your…

State v. Mason – 2021 UT App 41

April 23, 2021

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Contempt of Court, Custody, Women's Divorce Issues

2021, 2021 UT App 41, adjournment, and Cherise Bacalski, appointed counsel, April 8, assistance of counsel, Attorney for Appellee, Attorneys for Appellant, authority, Brent M. Johnson, Cedar City Department, concluded, contempt, contempt of court, contentious, court proceedings, court’s dignity, disobeying orders, disrupting proceedings, Emily Adams, evidence, ex-wife, Fifth District Court, Freyja Johnson, had the ability to comply, in the courtroom, intentionally failed or refused to do so, Judge Matthew L. Bell, judge was still on the bench, knew what was required, necessary, No. 190500085, Opinion No. 20190618-CA, post-divorce proceedings, punishment, Relocation, right, State v. Mason, summary criminal contempt proceedings, summary vindication, THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, Utah Code 78B-6-301(1), Utah Code 78B-6-301(5), Von Del Mason Jr.

State v. Mason – 2021 UT App 41 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. VON DEL MASON JR., Appellant. Opinion No. 20190618-CA Filed April 8, 2021 Fifth District Court, Cedar City Department The Honorable Matthew L.…

What do lawyers do if they can’t find case law to support the case at hand?

October 12, 2020

Divorce Utah

Appeal

appellate decisions, authority, case law, law, pound the table, precedent

What do lawyers do if they can’t find case law to support the case at hand? I think what you’re asking is what lawyers do if they cannot find statutes, rules, case law, or compelling reasoning that support their clients’…