Modification of Alimony Archives

Do you flee the country to avoid alimony? Or do you happily comply?

August 27, 2020

Alimony and Support, Modification of Alimony, Termination of Alimony

alimony, comply, flee the country, grudgingly, happily, modify, motion, move, pay, petition, terminate

Do you flee the country to avoid alimony? Or do you happily comply? First, let’s discuss the “option” of fleeing the country to avoid paying alimony. It’s not really an option unless you consider obeying the law optional. In one…

Janson v. Janson – 2019 UT App 106 – setting aside settlement agreement

June 24, 2019

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Court Rules, Division of Marital Property, Divorce Court, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Finances, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Motion Practice, Negotiation, Pension, Personal Property, Petition to Modify Decree of Divorce, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order), Real Estate/Real Property, Retirement Benefits, Separate Property, Settlement, Spousal Support, Termination of Alimony, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

2019, 2019 UT App 106, 401(k), alimony, both parties represented by counsel, court, DEIDRE SUE JANSON, discretion, divorce action, enforceable, extrinsic evidence, Honorable Andrew H. Stone, IRA, Jamie Carpenter Attorney for Appellant, JEFFREY ALAN JANSON, June 20, Kara L. Barton and Ashley Wood Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, marital home, meeting of the minds, motion to set aside a written stipulation, No. 164906327, Opinion No. 20170541-CA, pension, preserve an issue for appeal., purpose of considering extrinsic evidence, QDRO, Salt Lake Department, THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, Third District Court, to clarify ambiguous terms in the contract, Woodward formula

2019 UT App 106 – Janson v. Janson – setting aside stipulation THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DEIDRE SUE JANSON, Appellant, v. JEFFREY ALAN JANSON, Appellee. Opinion No. 20170541-CA Filed June 20, 2019 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The…

MacDonald v. MacDonald – 2018 UT 48 – modification of alimony

September 14, 2018

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Utah Supreme Court Decisions, Women's Divorce Issues

alimony modification, foreeable, modification of alimony, Utah Code § 30-3-5(8)(i)(i)

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter MacDonald v. MacDonald – 2018 UT 48 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH KIRKPATRICK MACDONALD, Petitioner, v. LEE ANN MACDONALD, Respondent. No. 20170789 Filed…

Paulsen v. Paulsen (2018 UT App 22 ) – modification of alimony

February 8, 2018

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Modification of Alimony

2018 UT App 22 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS HOLLY PAULSEN, Appellee, KEITH PAULSEN, Appellant. Opinion No. 20151014-CA Filed February 1, 2018 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Robert J. Dale No. 034701322 Matt G. Wadsworth, Attorney for Appellant…

Can alimony decrease if the payor’s income decreased?

September 22, 2017

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Modification of Alimony

QUESTION: Can the alimony award be decreased if the alimony payor had a drastic change in income?; i.e., if he lost his job or was demoted and now makes less than half of what he did previously? Is there a process to…