Termination of Alimony Archives

MacFarland v. MacFarland – 2021 UT App 58

July 16, 2021

Amicable Divorce, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Child Support Enforcement, Child Support Modification, Children in Divorce, Co-parenting, Cohabitation, Contempt of Court, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Custody, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Equitable Interest, Equity, Evidence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Joint Physical Custody, Judges, Justice and Equity, Legal System, Marital Home, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Modification of Child Custody, Modification of Child Support, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Modification of Parent-time, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Noncustodial parents, Parent Time, Petition to Modify Decree of Divorce, Physical Custody, Preparing for Divorce, Special Circumstances, Spousal Support, Termination of Alimony, Uncontested Divorce, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

§ 30-3-10.1, § 30-3-5, § 78B-12-108, § 78B-12-201, alimony, child custody, decree of divorce, joint physical custody, Modification, modifying, physical custody, Utah code

021 UT App 58 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS BRUCE RAY MCFARLAND, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. NICOLE S. MCFARLAND, Appellee and Cross-appellant. Opinion No. 20190541-CA Filed June 4, 2021 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable David J. Williams No.…

What would happen if there were no alimony or splitting assets in divorce without kids?

May 11, 2021

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Best Interest of the Child, Children in Divorce, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce Causes, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Prevention/Marriage Preservation, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Finances, Husband's or Wife's Business, Marital Debts, Marital Estate, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Pension, Personal Property, Retirement Benefits, Spousal Support, Spouse's Business, Termination of Alimony, Women's Divorce Issues

accrued, alimony, career, children, decrease, depends, divorce, financially, foregoes, funds, gold diggers, half, happiness, husbands, increase, lesbian couples, marital assets, marriage success, married couple, men, mutual devotion, no children, optimal, politically incorrect, rear children, reduce, relied, retirement funds, sacrifice, saved, self-interest, splitting, spouse, stay at home parent, suckers, traditional family, wives, women

That is an interesting question. Before I answer it, know this: anyone who is motivated to marry on a “what’s in it for me?” basis and who stays married motivated by a “what’s in it for me?” basis is likely…

2020 UT App 93 – Utah Court of Appeals – termination of alimony

September 24, 2020

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Termination of Alimony

alimony, default judgment, motion to set aside default, Rule 60(b), termination of alimony

2020 UT App 93 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KELLEY ANNE SOMER, Appellant, v. ERIC JOHN SOMER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190293-CA Filed June 11, 2020 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Richard D. McKelvie, No. 134900325 Carolyn Perkins, Attorney…

Do you flee the country to avoid alimony? Or do you happily comply?

August 27, 2020

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Modification of Alimony, Termination of Alimony

alimony, comply, flee the country, grudgingly, happily, modify, motion, move, pay, petition, terminate

Do you flee the country to avoid alimony? Or do you happily comply? First, let’s discuss the “option” of fleeing the country to avoid paying alimony. It’s not really an option unless you consider obeying the law optional. In one…

2019 UT App 147 – McQuarrie v. McQuarrie – termination of alimony

September 3, 2019

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Men's Divorce Issues, Settlement, Spousal Support, Termination of Alimony, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

termination of alimony, Utah Code Ann. § 30-3-5(10), Utah Code Ann. § 30-3-5(9)

2019 UT App 147 – McQuarrie v. McQuarrie THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MELVIN C. MCQUARRIE, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. JANETTE COLLEDGE MCQUARRIE, Appellee and Cross-appellant. Opinion No. 20170956-CA Filed August 29, 2019 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The…

Janson v. Janson – 2019 UT App 106 – setting aside settlement agreement

June 24, 2019

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Court Rules, Division of Marital Property, Divorce Court, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Finances, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Motion Practice, Negotiation, Pension, Personal Property, Petition to Modify Decree of Divorce, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order), Real Estate/Real Property, Retirement Benefits, Separate Property, Settlement, Spousal Support, Termination of Alimony, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

2019, 2019 UT App 106, 401(k), alimony, both parties represented by counsel, court, DEIDRE SUE JANSON, discretion, divorce action, enforceable, extrinsic evidence, Honorable Andrew H. Stone, IRA, Jamie Carpenter Attorney for Appellant, JEFFREY ALAN JANSON, June 20, Kara L. Barton and Ashley Wood Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, marital home, meeting of the minds, motion to set aside a written stipulation, No. 164906327, Opinion No. 20170541-CA, pension, preserve an issue for appeal., purpose of considering extrinsic evidence, QDRO, Salt Lake Department, THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, Third District Court, to clarify ambiguous terms in the contract, Woodward formula

2019 UT App 106 – Janson v. Janson – setting aside stipulation THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DEIDRE SUE JANSON, Appellant, v. JEFFREY ALAN JANSON, Appellee. Opinion No. 20170541-CA Filed June 20, 2019 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The…

Hosking v. Chambers – 2018 UT App 193 – termination of alimony

October 22, 2018

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Men's Divorce Issues, Termination of Alimony, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Women's Divorce Issues

alimony, cohabitation, common household involving shared expenses and shared decisions, intimate relationship, shared residence, termination, termination of alimony

2018 UT App 193 The Utah Court of Appeals CRAIG HOSKING, Appellee, v. ERIN JO CHAMBERS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20160444-CA Filed October 12, 2018 Second District Court, Ogden Department The Honorable W. Brent West No. 044901699 Jason B. Richards, Brandon…

Paulsen v. Paulsen (2018 UT App 19) – alimony modification

February 9, 2018

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Divorce Law, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Men's Divorce Issues, Termination of Alimony, Women's Divorce Issues

2018 UT App 19 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LYNESSA MICHELLE ANDERSON, Appellee, LOREN PRICE ANDERSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20160507-CA Filed February 1, 2018 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Samuel D. McVey No. 084400367 Rosemond G. Blakelock, Attorney…

Scott v. Scott – 2017 UT 66 – Utah Supreme Court – September 21, 2017 – termination of alimony for cohabitation

September 29, 2017

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Cohabitation, Termination of Alimony

2017, alimony, cohabitation, Scott v. Scott, termination, termination of alimony, Utah Supreme Court

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2017 UT 66 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH JILLIAN SCOTT, Petitioner, v. BRADLEY SCOTT, Respondent. No. 20160299 Filed September 21, 2017 On Certiorari…