Termination of Alimony Archives

Do you flee the country to avoid alimony? Or do you happily comply?

August 27, 2020

Alimony and Support, Modification of Alimony, Termination of Alimony

alimony, comply, flee the country, grudgingly, happily, modify, motion, move, pay, petition, terminate

Do you flee the country to avoid alimony? Or do you happily comply? First, let’s discuss the “option” of fleeing the country to avoid paying alimony. It’s not really an option unless you consider obeying the law optional. In one…

2019 UT App 147 – McQuarrie v. McQuarrie – termination of alimony

September 3, 2019

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Men's Divorce Issues, Settlement, Spousal Support, Termination of Alimony, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

termination of alimony, Utah Code Ann. § 30-3-5(10), Utah Code Ann. § 30-3-5(9)

2019 UT App 147 – McQuarrie v. McQuarrie THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MELVIN C. MCQUARRIE, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. JANETTE COLLEDGE MCQUARRIE, Appellee and Cross-appellant. Opinion No. 20170956-CA Filed August 29, 2019 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The…

Janson v. Janson – 2019 UT App 106 – setting aside settlement agreement

June 24, 2019

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Court Rules, Division of Marital Property, Divorce Court, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Finances, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Motion Practice, Negotiation, Pension, Personal Property, Petition to Modify Decree of Divorce, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order), Real Estate/Real Property, Retirement Benefits, Separate Property, Settlement, Spousal Support, Termination of Alimony, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

2019, 2019 UT App 106, 401(k), alimony, both parties represented by counsel, court, DEIDRE SUE JANSON, discretion, divorce action, enforceable, extrinsic evidence, Honorable Andrew H. Stone, IRA, Jamie Carpenter Attorney for Appellant, JEFFREY ALAN JANSON, June 20, Kara L. Barton and Ashley Wood Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, marital home, meeting of the minds, motion to set aside a written stipulation, No. 164906327, Opinion No. 20170541-CA, pension, preserve an issue for appeal., purpose of considering extrinsic evidence, QDRO, Salt Lake Department, THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, Third District Court, to clarify ambiguous terms in the contract, Woodward formula

2019 UT App 106 – Janson v. Janson – setting aside stipulation THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DEIDRE SUE JANSON, Appellant, v. JEFFREY ALAN JANSON, Appellee. Opinion No. 20170541-CA Filed June 20, 2019 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The…

Hosking v. Chambers – 2018 UT App 193 – termination of alimony

October 22, 2018

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Men's Divorce Issues, Termination of Alimony, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Women's Divorce Issues

alimony, cohabitation, common household involving shared expenses and shared decisions, intimate relationship, shared residence, termination, termination of alimony

2018 UT App 193 The Utah Court of Appeals CRAIG HOSKING, Appellee, v. ERIN JO CHAMBERS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20160444-CA Filed October 12, 2018 Second District Court, Ogden Department The Honorable W. Brent West No. 044901699 Jason B. Richards, Brandon…

Paulsen v. Paulsen (2018 UT App 19) – alimony modification

February 9, 2018

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Divorce Law, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Men's Divorce Issues, Termination of Alimony, Women's Divorce Issues

2018 UT App 19 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LYNESSA MICHELLE ANDERSON, Appellee, LOREN PRICE ANDERSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20160507-CA Filed February 1, 2018 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Samuel D. McVey No. 084400367 Rosemond G. Blakelock, Attorney…

Scott v. Scott – 2017 UT 66 – Utah Supreme Court – September 21, 2017 – termination of alimony for cohabitation

September 29, 2017

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Cohabitation, Termination of Alimony

2017, alimony, cohabitation, Scott v. Scott, termination, termination of alimony, Utah Supreme Court

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2017 UT 66 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH JILLIAN SCOTT, Petitioner, v. BRADLEY SCOTT, Respondent. No. 20160299 Filed September 21, 2017 On Certiorari…