Utah Court of Appeals Decisions Archives

State In Interest of B.W. – 2022 UT App 131

State In Interest of B.W. – 2022 UT App 131 Court of Appeals of Utah. STATE of Utah, IN the INTEREST OF B.W., J.W., and N.W., persons under eighteen years of age. H.W., Appellant, v. State of Utah, Appellee. No.…

Mower v. Mower – 2023 UT App 10 – Death of Spouse Before Court Rules

2023 UT App 10 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LIDIA V. MOWER, Appellant, v. THOMAS W. MOWER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210101-CA Filed January 20, 2023 Fourth District Court, American Fork Department The Honorable Roger W. Griffin No. 124100133 Cassie J.…

In Re K.K. – 2023 UT App 14 – Abuse and Neglect Adjudication

March 15, 2023

Divorce Utah

Abuse, Appeal, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Neglect, Court Orders, Custody, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS), Emotional abuse, Evidence, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Guardianship, Juvenile Court, Physical Custody, Procedure and Evidence, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law

(b), § 80-1-102(92), ¶ 14, ¶ 27, ¶ 9, 2011 UT 71, 2017 UT 44, 2018 UT App 141, 2020 UT App 114, 2021 UT 36, 2022 UT 39, 424 P.3d 91, 496 P.3d 58, abuse, abuse adjudication, against the clear weight of the evidence, and (B), appeal, both neglected and abused, clear and convincing evidence harmed or threatened harm, clearly erroneous, conclusions of law, defined, domestic violence in the presence of a children, error, Essential Botanical Farms, facts, findings of fact, In re A.B., In re C.M.R., in re E.R., In re K.T., In re N.M., juvenile court, LC v. Kay, mixed questions of law and fact, neglect adjudication, prejudiced, speculate, Utah Code § 80-1-102(1)(a)(i)(A), Utah Code § 80-1-102(37)(a), Utah Code § 80-3-402, Utah Code § 80-3-402(1), Utah Court of Appeals, very highly probable

In re K.K. – 2023 UT App 14 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF K.K., S.K., AND S.K., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. B.K., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20220051-CA…

Mintz v. Mintz – 2023 UT App 17

March 10, 2023

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Fault, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Husband's or Wife's Business, Infidelity, Marital Estate, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, Spouse's Business, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

¶ 11, ¶ 14, ¶ 15, ¶ 16, ¶ 2, ¶ 21, ¶ 46, ¶ 48, ¶ 5, ¶ 53, ¶ 57 n.8, ¶ 58 n.8, ¶ 8, 1166 (Utah Ct. App. 1997), 1170 (Utah Ct. App. 1990), 1211 (Utah Ct. App. 1991), 127 P.3d 1224, 131 P.3d 872, 141 P.3d 618, 145 A.3d 709, 1999 UT 86, 200 P.3d 223, 2001 UT App 157, 2003 UT App 357, 2005 UT App 518, 2006 UT App 301, 2006 UT App 75, 2009 UT App 10, 2009 UT App 233, 2011 UT App 41, 2012 UT App 373, 2014 UT App 26, 2017 UT App 133, 2017 UT App 137, 2019 UT 16, 2019 UT 61, 2019 UT App 114, 2020 UT App 141, 2021 UT App 77, 2022 UT App 47, 217 P.3d 733, 223 (Utah 1976); see also Allen Distrib., 232 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000), 248 P.3d 65, 294 P.3d 591, 321 P.3d 200, 402 P.3d 153, 402 P.3d 34, 445 P.3d 395, 449 P.3d 202, 452 P.3d 1134, 476 P.3d 145, 496 P.3d 242, 509 P.3d 265, 509 P.3d 265; Miner v. Miner, 534 S.E.2d 230, 536 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018), 554 P.2d 220, 604 P.2d 938, 689 (Utah 1939), 716 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016), 739 P.2d 83, 799 P.2d 1166, 80 P.3d 153, 806 P.2d 1209, 84 (Utah Ct. App. 1987), 87 P.2d 686, 908 N.W.2d 524, 934 P.2d 1164, 940 (Utah 1979), 993 P.2d 191, abuse of discretion, affirm, alimony, appeal, B.L. Key, Bakanowski v. Bakanowski, Bjarnson v. Bjarnson, book of business, Brady v. Park, Bryant v. Bryant, Burt v. Burt, Cheves v. Williams, circumstances, comforts, Cowley v. Porter, customary, dissipation of marital estate, divorce, Dobson v. Dobson, Eberhard v. Eberhard, employer asset, essential, Gardner v. Gardner, Holt v. Industrial Comm’n, Howell v. Howell, In re Marriage of Stenzel, Inc. v. Industrial Comm’n, Inc. v. Utah State Tax Comm’n, infidelity, investment accounts, Kemp v. Kemp, Kidd v. Kidd, Kimball v. Kimball, Knowles v. Knowles, Leppert v. Leppert, Lombardi v. Lombardi, luxuries, maintaining, minimum, Mintz v. Mintz - 2023 UT App 17, Mitchell v. Mitchell, n.1, National Advert. Co. v. Murray City Corp., necessities, Ortiz v. Crowther, proper status, property distribution, remand, reverse, Rule v. Rule, standard of living, Talley v. Talley, Utah law, Valentine v. Farmers Ins. Exch., Youth Tennis Found. v. Tax Comm’n

Mintz v. Mintz – 2023 UT App 17 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS RAYNA ELIZABETH MINTZ, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. GLEN RYAN MINTZ, Appellee and Cross-appellant. Opinion No. 20200507-CA Filed February 9, 2023 Third District Court, Silver Summit Department The…

In Re J.E. – 2023 UT App 3 – Challenge to Voluntary Declaration of Paternity

March 9, 2023

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Court Orders, Court Rules, Family Law, Juvenile Court, Parental Rights, Procedure and Evidence, Termination of Parental Rights, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law

voluntary declaration of paternity

In re J.E. – 2023 UT App 3 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF J.E., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. D.E., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210921-CA Filed January…

Myers v. Myers 2023 UT App 20 – Alimony Modification

March 8, 2023

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Finances, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Husband's or Wife's Business, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Procedure and Evidence, Termination of Alimony, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

¶ 11, ¶ 14, ¶ 19, ¶ 27, ¶ 28, ¶ 30, ¶ 31, ¶ 42, ¶ 6, ¶ 7, ¶ 8, ¶ 9, ¶¶ 14–15, 1075 (Utah 1985), 1999 UT App 12, 1999 UT App 219, 1999 UT App 41, 2003 UT App 357, 2004 PA Super 37, 2014 UT App 204, 2014 UT App 211, 2017 UT App 150, 2017 UT App 155, 2018 UT App 175, 2018 UT App 189, 2018 UT App 22, 2018 UT App 75, 2019 UT App 207, 2021 UT App 77, 2022 UT App 36, 2022 UT App 88, 2023 UT App 20, 334 P.3d 994, 335 P.3d 378, 402 P.3d 219, 405 P.3d 749, 412 (Utah 1977), 414 P.3d 1023, 424 P.3d 1113, 436 P.3d 294, 437 P.3d 411, 456 P.3d 1159, 496 P.3d 242, 508 P.3d 612, 515 P.3d 481, 565 P.2d 409, 566 (Utah 1985), 700 P.2d 1072, 704 P.2d 564, 80 P.3d 153, 843 A.2d 1247, 973 P.2d 431, 974 P.2d 306, 983 P.2d 1103, ability to pay, alimony, Armendariz v. Armendariz, Barrani v. Barrani, Bukunowski v. Bukunowski, Degao Xu v. Hongguang Zhao, demonstrated need, earning capacity, English v. English, Fox v. Fox, Gerwe v. Gerwe, Jones v. Jones, maximum permissible alimony award, Miner v. Miner, modification of alimony, modifying alimony, Moon v. Moon, Myers v. Myers, need, Nicholson v. Nicholson, Olson v. Olson, Pankhurst v. Pankhurst, Paulsen v. Paulsen, PEEPLES v. PEEPLES, Rehn v. Rehn, Roberts v. Roberts, substantial material change in circumstances, Utah Code § 30-3-5, Utah Court of Appeals, Vanderzon v. Vanderzon, voluntary unemployment, Williamson v. Williamson, Woskob v. Woskob

Myers v. Myers 2023 UT App 20 2023 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS AMY R. MYERS, Appellee, v. JACOB W. MYERS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220002-CA Filed March 2, 2023 Sixth District Court, Richfield Department The Honorable Brody…

Wellman v. Kawasaki – 2023 UT App 11 – Alimony

March 3, 2023

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Divorce, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Judges, Men's Divorce Issues, Procedure and Evidence, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

¶ 14, 2014 UT App 211, 2015 UT 79, 2021 UT App 77, 335 P.3d 378, 459 P.3d 276, 496 P.3d 242, 700 P.2d 1072 (Utah 1985), Dahl v. Dahl, equalize the standards of living of each party, financial declaration, Jones v. Jones, Miner v. Miner, need must constitute the maximum permissible alimony award, prevent recipient spouse from becoming a public charge, purposes of alimony, Roberts v. Roberts, standard of living that existed during the marriage, statutory alimony factors, supporting] financial documentation, Utah Code § 30-3-5(10), Utah law, Utah R. Civ. P. 26.1(c).

2023 UT App 11 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DAVID WELLMAN, Appellee, v. KRISTIN KAWASAKI, Appellant. Opinion No. 20210265-CA Filed February 2, 2023 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Christine S. Johnson No. 174402919 Mary Deiss Brown, Attorney for…

In Re A.H. – 2022 UT App 114 – Termination of Parental Rights

March 2, 2023

Divorce Utah

Adoption, Appeal, Best Interest of the Child, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Neglect, Child Protective Services, Child Support, Court Orders, Custody, Evidence, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Grandparent rights, Guardianship, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Judges, Juvenile Court, Mental Illness, Parental Fitness, Parental Rights, Physical Custody, Procedure and Evidence, Substance Abuse, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law

2021 UT 19, 455 U.S. 745, 530 U.S. 57, 648 P.2d 1364, abandonment, abuse, adoption, appeals, best interest, clear and convincing evidence standard, deference, federal and state constitutions Troxel v. Granville, foster parents, fundamental rights, guardianship, In re G.D., In re J.P., juvenile court, lower court findings, most important rights, neglect, parental rights, permanent guardianship, present-tense fashion, relatives, reverse, right of parents to raise their children, Santosky v. Kramer, stipulation, strictly necessary, termination, two-part test, United States Constitution, Utah Code § 80-4-104(1)

2022 UT App 114 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF A.H., J.H., J.H., L.H., N.H., S.H., AND E.H., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. N.J.H. AND S.H., Appellants, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion…

In Re J.E. 2023 UT App 3, Voluntary Declaration of Paternity

2023 UT App 3 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF J.E., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. D.E., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210921-CA Filed January 20, 2023 Third District…

In Re K.T. 2023 UT App 5 – Substantiation of Child Abuse

2023 UT App 5 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF K.T., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. J.K., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210553-CA Filed January 20, 2023 Third District…

Oldroyd v. Oldroyd – 2022 UT App 145 – Premarital Property

February 1, 2023

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Coping With Divorce, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Equitable Interest, Equity, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Marital Estate, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Prenuptial Agreements, Preparing for Divorce, Property Division, Special Circumstances, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Women's Divorce Issues

2022, 2022 UT App 145, acquiring interest in a spouse’s premarital property, contributions, December 22, equitable division, extraordinary situation exception, interest in spouse’s premarital property, Judge Noel S. Hyde, Morgan Department, Oldroyd v. Farrell Lynn Oldroyd, Opinion No. 20210073-CA, premarital property, premaritally acquired, property contribution exception, Second District Court, spouse’s premarital property, Utah Court of Appeals

2022 UT App 145 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ROBBEN ANN OLDROYD, Appellant, v. FARRELL LYNN OLDROYD, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210073-CA Filed December 22, 2022 Second District Court, Morgan Department The Honorable Noel S. Hyde No. 134500028 Brent D. Wride,…

Is 50/50 custody likely when the parents live in the same neighborhood?

What is the likelihood of reverting to 50/50 custody when the parents live in the same neighborhood? Mom still cares for the child over 80% Your question states in part, “What is the likelihood of reverting to 50-50 custody.” Your…

If you get a divorce but everything is in your name, do you have to split it?

If you get a divorce but everything is in your name, do you get to keep everything or do you have to split it? I will answer your question in the context of the law of the jurisdiction where I…

Taylor v. Taylor 2022 UT 35 – Divorce Arbitration

August 29, 2022

Divorce Utah

Arbitration, Utah, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions

arbitration, divorce law, private judge

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH DAVID JENKINS TAYLOR, Appellant, v. JILL MARIE TAYLOR, Appellee. No. 20191090 Heard: April 13, 2022 Filed August 18, 2022 On Certification from the Court of Appeals Third District, Summit County The…

Fox v. Fox 2022 UT App 88 – alimony

Fox v. Fox 2022 UT App 88 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DIANN SHERI FOX, Appellant, v. BENJAMIN DAVIS FOX, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200949-CA Filed July 14, 2022 Fifth District Court, St. George Department The Honorable Matthew L. Bell No.…

Can you get a post-judgment interest rate higher than the statutory rate?

Did you know you can request a post-judgment interest rate that is higher than the default statutory rate? It’s true. While the court does not have the discretion to lower, stay, or waive statutory interest rate, it does have discretion…

Nix v. Nix – 2022 UT App 83- insufficient evidence of adultery

2022 UT App 83 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JILL NIX, Appellee, v. ROLAND COMPTON NIX JR., Appellant. Opinion No. 20200691-CA Filed June 30, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Darold J. McDade No. 174402122 Seth D. Needs,…

How do you prove duress in a divorce?

I will answer your question in the context of Utah law because I practice divorce and family law in the state of Utah. First, here is how duress is defined in Utah: ¶ 23 Under Utah law, duress exists when…

Duffin v. Duffin – 2022 UT App 60

2022 UT App 60 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAMES M. DUFFIN III, Appellee and Cross-appellant, v. BRANDY E. DUFFIN, Appellant and Cross-appellee. Opinion No. 20200361-CA Filed May 12, 2022 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Matthew Bates No. 184400962 T. Jake Hinkins and…

Beckham v. Beckham, 2022 UT App 65

2022 UT App 65 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS VICKI BECKHAM, Appellee, v. RANDALL BECKHAM, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200935-CA Filed May 19, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence No. 194901020 Ben W. Lieberman, Attorney…