If everyone agrees that the judge needs to know what the child is experiencing, observing, and feeling, why won’t the judge interview the child?
Child Custody, Child Neglect, Children in Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Discovery, Divorce Court, GAL (Guardian ad Litem), Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parental Alienation, Special Circumstances, Utah Code, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues
analyses, child, concerns, custody evaluator argument, difference, experiencing, feel, feeling, GAL, guardian ad litem, harmful, independently verifiable proof, interview, judge, judge interview, know, merit, needs, observing, painful, real harm, recommendations, reported to DOPL or sued for malpractice., risk of harm, timid, unwarranted harm, vague, without merit
If everyone agrees that the judge needs to know what the child is experiencing, observing, and feeling, why won’t the judge interview the child? This post is the seventh in series of 15 posts on the subject of custody…