BLANK

Tag: Utah Court of Appeals

Home Utah Court of Appeals

Twitchell v. Twitchell – 2022 UT App 49 – child custody and support

April 18, 2022

Appeal, Best Interest of the Child, Child Custody, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Children in Divorce, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Domestic Violence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parent Time, Parental Fitness, Parenting Plan, Physical Custody, Preparing for Divorce, Procedure and Evidence, Sole Custody, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Visitation, Women's Divorce Issues

appeal, calculation, child custody, Child Support, child support obligation, conclusions of law, deviate, district court, divorce decree, Domestic Violence, evidence, findings of fact, income, moral character, neglect, Parent Time, physical abuse, physical custody, statutory minimum schedule, trial court, Utah Code § 30-3-10, Utah Code § 30-3-34, Utah Code § 30-3-35, Utah Code § 30-3-35.5, Utah Code § 78B-12-203, Utah Court of Appeals

Twitchell v. Twitchell – 2022 UT App 49 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAZMIN S. TWITCHELL, Appellee, V. JOSEPH N. TWITCHELL, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200546-CA Filed April 14, 2022 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Brian G. Cannell No.…

In re Adoption of E.M.F. – 2022 UT App 43 time in which to appeal

In re Adoption of E.M.F… – 2022 UT App 43 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF E.M.F. AND M.S.F., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. S.S. AND B.S., Appellants, v. J.F., Appellee. Opinion No.…

2022 UT App 15 – Miller v. DaSilva – protective order objections

February 10, 2022

Abuse, Appeal, Civil Stalking, Civil Stalking Injunction, Court Orders, Court Rules, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Domestic Relations Commissioners, Domestic Violence, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Protective Orders, Stalking, Stalking Injunction/Civil Stalking Injunction, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

§ 78B-7-604, § 78B-7-603, 10 days, 14 days, Chapter 7, cohabitant abuse, cohabitant abuse act, cohabitant abuse protective order, Cohabitant Abuse Protective Orders, commissioner, domestic abuse, ex parte protective order, hearing, Judicial Code, Part 6, petitioner, protective order, Protective Orders and Stalking Injunctions, recommendations, respondent, rule 108, Title 78B, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah R. Civ. P. 108(a), Utah R. Jud. Admin. 6-401, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure

2022 UT App 15 – Miller v. DaSilva http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/view.html?court=appopin&opinion=Miller v. Dasilva20220203_20200719_15.pdf THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LISA M. MILLER, Appellant, v. AMY ELIZABETH DASILVA, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200719-CA Filed February 3, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable…

Wadsworth v. Wadsworth – 2022 UT App 5 – marital estate

January 17, 2022

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Business Interests, Business Valuation, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Causes, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Equity, Evidence, Expert Witnesses, Extramarital affairs/Adultery, Family Law, Finances, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Husband's or Wife's Business, Infidelity, Judges, Justice and Equity, Lawyer Fees, Legal System, Marital Debts, Marital Estate, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Personal Property, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, Real Estate/Real Property, Spousal Support, Spouse's Business, Taxation, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Valuation, Women's Divorce Issues

appellate case, appellate decision, court of appeals, divorce law, family law, Utah Court of Appeals

2022 UT App 5 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS CANDI WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. GUY L. WADSWORTH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190106-CA No. 20200430-CA Filed January 13, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Su Chon No. 104904966 Michael D.…

T.W. v. S.A. – 2021 UT App 132 – child custody

January 14, 2022

Alimony and Support, Amicable Divorce, Annulment of Marriage, Antenuptial Agreements, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Best Interest of the Child, Business Interests, Business Valuation, Child Abuse, Child Care Costs, Child Care/Surrogate Care, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Child Neglect, Child Protective Order, Child Protective Services, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Child Support Enforcement, Child Support Modification, Children in Divorce, Civil Stalking, Civil Stalking Injunction, Co-parenting, Cohabitation, Common Law Marriage, Contempt of Court, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custodial Interference, Custody, Custody Evaluation, Daycare, Debts, Dirty Tricks, Discovery, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS), Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Causes, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Utah, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

appellate courts, child custody, child custody arrangement, child custody award, court decisions, custody, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah law

2021 UT App 132 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS T.W., Appellant, v. S.A., Appellee. Opinion No. 20200397-CA Filed November 26, 2021 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Dianna Gibson No. 134401457 David Pedrazas, Attorney for Appellant Laja K.…

Sanders v. Sanders – 2021 UT App 122

2021 UT App 122 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KRISTINE L. SANDERS, Appellee, v. TRAVIS JAMES SANDERS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200618-CA Filed November 12, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Todd M. Shaughnessy No. 014901182 Grace Acosta, Attorney for Appellant Steven M. Rogers,…

Fischer v. Fischer – 2021 UT App 145 – marital vs. separate property

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS GARY LEE FISCHER, Appellant, v. MELISSA KAY FISCHER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200557-CA Filed December 30, 2021 Seventh District Court, Moab Department The Honorable Don Torgerson No. 184700047 Steve S. Christensen and Clinton R. Brimhall, Attorneys…

What are the divorce laws in Utah?

October 21, 2021

Divorce Law, Family Law, Utah, Utah Code, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law

divorce law, family law, law, Utah, Utah code, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Legislature, Utah Supreme Court

I don’t want to appear immodest, but honestly, my book is probably the best source in one volume: https://store.legal.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Treatises/Utah-Family-Law-2020-2021-ed-Vol-2-Utah-Practice-Series/p/106664782 You can also find the laws governing Utah divorce and family law at the Utah State Legislature’s website, particularly (but not…

In re A.B. – 2021 UT App 91

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF A.B., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. K.T., Appellant, v.. S.T. AND T.T., Appellees. Opinion No. 20200342-CA Filed August 26, 2021 Third District Juvenile Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Julie V. Lund No. 1174795 Steve…

2021 UT App 77 – Miner v. Miner – alimony, attorney fees

2021 UT App 77 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LISA P. MINER, Appellee, JOHN E. MINER, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200098-CA Filed July 15, 2021 Fifth District Court, St. George Department The Honorable Jeffrey C. Wilcox No. 174500373 …

Nakkina v. Mahanthi – 2021 UT App 63 – joint equal custody, marital property, attorney fees

July 2, 2021

Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Best Interest of the Child, Child Custody, Children in Divorce, Co-parenting, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Divorce, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Equity, Evidence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Joint Physical Custody, Judges, Justice and Equity, Lawyer Fees, Legal System, Marital Estate, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parental Fitness, Parental Rights, Parenting Plan, Personal Property, Physical Custody, Preparing for Divorce, Property Division, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

attorney's fees award, interspousal gifts, joint equal physical custody, joint parent-time, joint physical custody, marital property, Nakkina v. Mahanthi - 2021 UT App 63, Utah Court of Appeals

Nakkina v. Mahanthi – 2021 UT App 63 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SIREESHA NAKKINA, Appellee, v. PRODEEP KUMAR MAHANTHI, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190750-CA Filed June 17, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence No.…

In re A.H. – 2021 UT App 57, Ineffective Assistance, Reasonable Efforts

ttps://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/appopin/In%20re%20A.H…20210528_20190846_57.pdf In re A.H. – 2021 UT App 57 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF A.H. AND N.H., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. K.H., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190846-CA Filed May 28, 2021 Third District Juvenile Court, Salt Lake Department …

Allen v. Allen – 2021 UT App 20 – custody, alimony, child support

March 1, 2021

Alimony and Support, Child Custody, Child Support, Child Support Enforcement, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Spousal Support, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

alimony, child custody, Child Support, contempt, custody, spousal support, Utah Court of Appeals

Allen v. Allen – 2021 UT App 20 http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/view.html?court=appopin&opinion=Allen v. Allen20210225_20190369_20.pdf 2021 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS REBECCA ELLEN ALLEN, Appellee, v. KENT DARIUS ALLEN,Appellant. Opinion No. 20190369-CA Filed February 25, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake…

Thomas v. Thomas – 2021 UT App – contempt, modification of custody

February 2, 2021

Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Children in Divorce, Custody, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Child Custody, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Modification of Parent-time, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parent Time, Parental Alienation, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Visitation, Women's Divorce Issues

2021 UT App 8, alienating, animosity, attorney fees, attorney fees and costs on appeal, children, conflicts, contempt, daughter, denying parent-time, derogatory, discussing adult issues with the children, disparaging, divorce, divorce decree, fine, had the ability to comply, Honorable Anthony L. Howell, intentionally failed or refused to do so, joint physical custody, knew what was required, love and affection, Parent Time, parent-time schedule, parenting disputes, primary custody, purge contempt, putting the children in the middle, rule 53, sanctions, son, special master, supervised, suspension of any licenses issued by the state, therapy, thirty days incarceration in county jail, Thomas v. Thomas - 2021 UT App, triangulate, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure

Thomas v. Thomas – 2021 UT App 2021 UT App 8 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JEREMY THOMAS, Appellant, v. JODY TASKER THOMAS, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190242-CA Filed January 22,2021 Fourth District Court, Nephi Department The Honorable Anthony L. Howell…

2020 UT App 16 – THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS – lack of jurisdiction

February 10, 2020

Appeal, Child Support Modification, Court Rules, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions

2020, 2020 UT App 16, Al-Saleh v. Al-Saleh, final appealable order, January 30, lack of jurisdiction, Patrick Corum, rule 54(b), Third District Court, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure

2020 UT App 16 – THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS NOUR AL-SALEH, Appellee v. ASAAD AL-SALEH, Appellant. Per Curiam Opinion No. 20191013-CA Filed January 30, 2020 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Patrick Corum No. 154905136 Cassandra Elyse…

2019 UT App 208 – In re E.R. – termination of parental rights

2019 UT App 208 – THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF E.R., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. J.R., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH,Appellee. Opinion No. 20190184-CA Filed December 19, 2019 Fourth District…

2019 UT App 204 – In re H.F. incorrect analysis terminating parental rights

2019 UT App 204 – THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF H.F., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. J.F., Appellant, v. E.F., Appellee. Opinion No. 20180348-CA Filed December 12, 2019 Third District Juvenile…

2019 UT App 202 – State v. Baize – protective order challenge

January 15, 2020

Domestic Violence, Men's Divorce Issues, Protective Orders, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

§ 77-36-1.1, 2019, any other form of abuse, cannot attack validity of protective order, child, civil in nature, collateral bar rule, collaterally attack, communicate, contact, December 12, directly, divorced, e-mail, four counts, harassing, indirectly, joint legal custody verbal abuse, mail, married, offended, phone, physical abuse, physically hurting, protective order, Respondent appealed his convictions for violating a protective order and lost. 2019 UT App 202, review for correctness, sole physical custody, stalking, State v. Baize, threatening, unconstitutional prior restraint of speech, unconstitutionally vague, Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-108, Utah Court of Appeals, violating, violating protective order, violence

2019 UT App 202 – THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. NATHAN DAVID BAIZE, Appellant. Opinion No. 20180326-CA Filed December 12, 2019 Fourth District Court, American Fork Department The Honorable Roger W. Griffin No. 161100835 Douglas…

2019 UT App 207 – Peeples v. Peeples – modification of child custody

January 7, 2020

Abuse, Best Interest of the Child, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Children in Divorce, Co-parenting, Contempt of Court, Coping With Divorce, Custody, Custody Evaluation, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Expert Witnesses, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, GAL (Guardian ad Litem), Joint Legal Custody, Mediation, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Child Custody, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Negotiation, Parenting Plan, Physical Custody, Procedure and Evidence, Protective Orders, Restraining Orders, Sole Custody, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

2019, 2019 UT App 207, best interest, bifurcate, bifurcated decree, children failed to demonstrate substantial change in the circumstances, clear error, custody evaluator, December 19, denied visitation, distinction between stipulated and adjudicated decrees, domestic relations commissioner, emotional, emotional abuse, failed to meet burden to prove change in circumstances, five out of every fourteen, guardian ad litem, in “high conflict” cases burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances is higher than normal, incorrect legal standard decree was stipulated rather than adjudicated, intellectual, joint legal custody, modify divorce decree, moral development, motion to dismiss, no change in circumstances, no separate standard that courts are to apply in high-conflict cases when considering whether a substantial change of circumstances is present in the context of a petition to modify, Opinion No. 20180713-CA, overnights, PEEPLES v. PEEPLES, ping-pong custody awards, presence or absence of a substantial change in circumstances, primary physical custody, protective order, reasonable degree of stability, res judicata, school year, settlement conference, sole custody, sole physical custody, stable employment, stable home environment, summertime, Utah Code Ann. § 30-3-10.4(2)(b), Utah Court of Appeals, violations of decree could be resolved in contempt proceedings, violence

2019 UT App 207 – THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ADAM LEGRANDE PEEPLES, Appellee, v. ANNALEISE T. PEEPLES, Appellant. Opinion No. 20180713-CA Filed December 19, 2019 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Andrew H. Stone No. 044901980 Brian…

Burggraaf v. Burggraaf – 2019 UT App 195 – imputing income, vacating alimony

December 9, 2019

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Child Custody, Child Support, Child Support Enforcement, Children in Divorce, Co-parenting, Custody, Debts, Discovery, Division of Marital Property, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Law, Divorce Preparedness, Domestic Violence, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Fault, Finances, Joint Legal Custody, Joint Physical Custody, Judges, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parent Time, Personal Property, Physical Custody, Property Division, Real Estate/Real Property, Sole Custody, Spousal Support, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Visitation, Women's Divorce Issues

2019 UT App 195, ability to pay, alimony, appeal, calculating alimony, calculating child support, Child Support, debt, divorce, imputed income, need, property distribution, separate debt, student loans, Utah Court of Appeals, vacate

2019 UT App 195 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS CAROL BURGGRAAF, Appellee, v. BRIAN JOSEPH BURGGRAAF, Appellant. Opinion No. 20180405-CA Filed November 29, 2019 Second District Court, Ogden Department The Honorable Camille L. Neider No. 154902227 Julie J. Nelson, Erin…

Menu