Utah Court of Appeals Archives

Tithing Can Be a Legitimate Personal Expense in the Context of Determining the Alimony Award

Whether my recollection is true or not, I remember being taught in law school that tithing and other regular charitable giving cannot be treated as a personal expense deduction in bankruptcy. It appears that is no longer true (if ever…

Nelson v. Nelson – 2023 UT App 38 – Claim Preclusion and Child Support

2023 UT App 38 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STASHIA NELSON, Appellee, v. ISAAC SCOTT NELSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20210345-CA Filed April 13, 2023 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Brian G. Cannell No. 154100713 Sara Pfrommer, Ronald D.…

Mower v. Mower – 2023 UT App 10 – Death of Spouse Before Court Rules

2023 UT App 10 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LIDIA V. MOWER, Appellant, v. THOMAS W. MOWER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210101-CA Filed January 20, 2023 Fourth District Court, American Fork Department The Honorable Roger W. Griffin No. 124100133 Cassie J.…

In Re K.K. – 2023 UT App 14 – Abuse and Neglect Adjudication

March 15, 2023

Divorce Utah

Abuse, Appeal, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Neglect, Court Orders, Custody, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS), Emotional abuse, Evidence, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Guardianship, Juvenile Court, Physical Custody, Procedure and Evidence, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law

(b), § 80-1-102(92), ¶ 14, ¶ 27, ¶ 9, 2011 UT 71, 2017 UT 44, 2018 UT App 141, 2020 UT App 114, 2021 UT 36, 2022 UT 39, 424 P.3d 91, 496 P.3d 58, abuse, abuse adjudication, against the clear weight of the evidence, and (B), appeal, both neglected and abused, clear and convincing evidence harmed or threatened harm, clearly erroneous, conclusions of law, defined, domestic violence in the presence of a children, error, Essential Botanical Farms, facts, findings of fact, In re A.B., In re C.M.R., in re E.R., In re K.T., In re N.M., juvenile court, LC v. Kay, mixed questions of law and fact, neglect adjudication, prejudiced, speculate, Utah Code § 80-1-102(1)(a)(i)(A), Utah Code § 80-1-102(37)(a), Utah Code § 80-3-402, Utah Code § 80-3-402(1), Utah Court of Appeals, very highly probable

In re K.K. – 2023 UT App 14 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF K.K., S.K., AND S.K., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. B.K., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20220051-CA…

In re K.K. – 2023 UT App 13

March 14, 2023

Divorce Utah

Abuse, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Neglect, Court Orders, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS), Emotional abuse, Evidence, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Guardianship, Juvenile Court, Physical Custody, Procedure and Evidence, Uncategorized, Utah Law

(b), § 80-1-102(92), ¶ 14, ¶ 27, ¶ 9, 2011 UT 71, 2017 UT 44, 2018 UT App 141, 2020 UT App 114, 2021 UT 36, 2022 UT 39, 424 P.3d 91, 496 P.3d 58, abuse, abuse adjudication, against the clear weight of the evidence, and (B), appeal, both neglected and abused, clear and convincing evidence harmed or threatened harm, clearly erroneous, conclusions of law, defined, domestic violence in the presence of a children, error, Essential Botanical Farms, facts, findings of fact, In re A.B., In re C.M.R., in re E.R., In re K.T., In re N.M., juvenile court, LC v. Kay, mixed questions of law and fact, neglect adjudication, prejudiced, speculate, Utah Code § 80-1-102(1)(a)(i)(A), Utah Code § 80-1-102(37)(a), Utah Code § 80-3-402, Utah Code § 80-3-402(1), Utah Court of Appeals, very highly probable

In re K.K. – 2023 UT App 13 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF K.K., S.K., AND S.K., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. D.K., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20220050-CA…

Myers v. Myers 2023 UT App 20 – Alimony Modification

March 8, 2023

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Evidence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Finances, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Husband's or Wife's Business, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Procedure and Evidence, Termination of Alimony, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

¶ 11, ¶ 14, ¶ 19, ¶ 27, ¶ 28, ¶ 30, ¶ 31, ¶ 42, ¶ 6, ¶ 7, ¶ 8, ¶ 9, ¶¶ 14–15, 1075 (Utah 1985), 1999 UT App 12, 1999 UT App 219, 1999 UT App 41, 2003 UT App 357, 2004 PA Super 37, 2014 UT App 204, 2014 UT App 211, 2017 UT App 150, 2017 UT App 155, 2018 UT App 175, 2018 UT App 189, 2018 UT App 22, 2018 UT App 75, 2019 UT App 207, 2021 UT App 77, 2022 UT App 36, 2022 UT App 88, 2023 UT App 20, 334 P.3d 994, 335 P.3d 378, 402 P.3d 219, 405 P.3d 749, 412 (Utah 1977), 414 P.3d 1023, 424 P.3d 1113, 436 P.3d 294, 437 P.3d 411, 456 P.3d 1159, 496 P.3d 242, 508 P.3d 612, 515 P.3d 481, 565 P.2d 409, 566 (Utah 1985), 700 P.2d 1072, 704 P.2d 564, 80 P.3d 153, 843 A.2d 1247, 973 P.2d 431, 974 P.2d 306, 983 P.2d 1103, ability to pay, alimony, Armendariz v. Armendariz, Barrani v. Barrani, Bukunowski v. Bukunowski, Degao Xu v. Hongguang Zhao, demonstrated need, earning capacity, English v. English, Fox v. Fox, Gerwe v. Gerwe, Jones v. Jones, maximum permissible alimony award, Miner v. Miner, modification of alimony, modifying alimony, Moon v. Moon, Myers v. Myers, need, Nicholson v. Nicholson, Olson v. Olson, Pankhurst v. Pankhurst, Paulsen v. Paulsen, PEEPLES v. PEEPLES, Rehn v. Rehn, Roberts v. Roberts, substantial material change in circumstances, Utah Code § 30-3-5, Utah Court of Appeals, Vanderzon v. Vanderzon, voluntary unemployment, Williamson v. Williamson, Woskob v. Woskob

Myers v. Myers 2023 UT App 20 2023 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS AMY R. MYERS, Appellee, v. JACOB W. MYERS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220002-CA Filed March 2, 2023 Sixth District Court, Richfield Department The Honorable Brody…

Oldroyd v. Oldroyd – 2022 UT App 145 – Premarital Property

February 1, 2023

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Coping With Divorce, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Equitable Interest, Equity, Family Law, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Marital Estate, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Prenuptial Agreements, Preparing for Divorce, Property Division, Special Circumstances, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Women's Divorce Issues

2022, 2022 UT App 145, acquiring interest in a spouse’s premarital property, contributions, December 22, equitable division, extraordinary situation exception, interest in spouse’s premarital property, Judge Noel S. Hyde, Morgan Department, Oldroyd v. Farrell Lynn Oldroyd, Opinion No. 20210073-CA, premarital property, premaritally acquired, property contribution exception, Second District Court, spouse’s premarital property, Utah Court of Appeals

2022 UT App 145 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ROBBEN ANN OLDROYD, Appellant, v. FARRELL LYNN OLDROYD, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210073-CA Filed December 22, 2022 Second District Court, Morgan Department The Honorable Noel S. Hyde No. 134500028 Brent D. Wride,…

2023 UT App 10 – Death of Spouse Before Court Rules

2023 UT App 10 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LIDIA V. MOWER, Appellant, v. THOMAS W. MOWER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210101-CA Filed January 20, 2023 Fourth District Court, American Fork Department The Honorable Roger W. Griffin No. 124100133 Cassie J. Medura and Jarrod H. Jennings, Attorneys for…

Nix v. Nix – 2022 UT App 83- insufficient evidence of adultery

2022 UT App 83 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JILL NIX, Appellee, v. ROLAND COMPTON NIX JR., Appellant. Opinion No. 20200691-CA Filed June 30, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Darold J. McDade No. 174402122 Seth D. Needs,…

How do you prove duress in a divorce?

I will answer your question in the context of Utah law because I practice divorce and family law in the state of Utah. First, here is how duress is defined in Utah: ¶ 23 Under Utah law, duress exists when…

Duffin v. Duffin – 2022 UT App 60

2022 UT App 60 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAMES M. DUFFIN III, Appellee and Cross-appellant, v. BRANDY E. DUFFIN, Appellant and Cross-appellee. Opinion No. 20200361-CA Filed May 12, 2022 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Matthew Bates No. 184400962 T. Jake Hinkins and…

Beckham v. Beckham, 2022 UT App 65

2022 UT App 65 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS VICKI BECKHAM, Appellee, v. RANDALL BECKHAM, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200935-CA Filed May 19, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence No. 194901020 Ben W. Lieberman, Attorney…

Horne v. Horne – 2022 UT App 54 – 60(b) motion to set aside

2022 UT App 54 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS REBECCA A. HORNE, Appellee, v. TODD D. HORNE, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200845-CA Filed April 28, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence No. 194905732 Mary C.…

Twitchell v. Twitchell – 2022 UT App 49 – child custody and support

April 18, 2022

Divorce Utah

Appeal, Best Interest of the Child, Child Custody, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Children in Divorce, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custody, Dirty Tricks, Divorce, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Domestic Violence, Family Law, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Parent Time, Parental Fitness, Parenting Plan, Physical Custody, Preparing for Divorce, Procedure and Evidence, Sole Custody, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Visitation, Women's Divorce Issues

appeal, calculation, child custody, Child Support, child support obligation, conclusions of law, deviate, district court, divorce decree, Domestic Violence, evidence, findings of fact, income, moral character, neglect, Parent Time, physical abuse, physical custody, statutory minimum schedule, trial court, Utah Code § 30-3-10, Utah Code § 30-3-34, Utah Code § 30-3-35, Utah Code § 30-3-35.5, Utah Code § 78B-12-203, Utah Court of Appeals

Twitchell v. Twitchell – 2022 UT App 49 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAZMIN S. TWITCHELL, Appellee, V. JOSEPH N. TWITCHELL, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200546-CA Filed April 14, 2022 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Brian G. Cannell No.…

In re Adoption of E.M.F. – 2022 UT App 43 time in which to appeal

In re Adoption of E.M.F… – 2022 UT App 43 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF E.M.F. AND M.S.F., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. S.S. AND B.S., Appellants, v. J.F., Appellee. Opinion No.…

2022 UT App 15 – Miller v. DaSilva – protective order objections

February 10, 2022

Divorce Utah

Abuse, Appeal, Civil Stalking, Civil Stalking Injunction, Court Orders, Court Rules, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Domestic Relations Commissioners, Domestic Violence, Judges, Legal System, Men's Divorce Issues, Protective Orders, Stalking, Stalking Injunction/Civil Stalking Injunction, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Court Rules, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

§ 78B-7-604, § 78B-7-603, 10 days, 14 days, Chapter 7, cohabitant abuse, cohabitant abuse act, cohabitant abuse protective order, Cohabitant Abuse Protective Orders, commissioner, domestic abuse, ex parte protective order, hearing, Judicial Code, Part 6, petitioner, protective order, Protective Orders and Stalking Injunctions, recommendations, respondent, rule 108, Title 78B, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah R. Civ. P. 108(a), Utah R. Jud. Admin. 6-401, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure

2022 UT App 15 – Miller v. DaSilva http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/view.html?court=appopin&opinion=Miller v. Dasilva20220203_20200719_15.pdf THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LISA M. MILLER, Appellant, v. AMY ELIZABETH DASILVA, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200719-CA Filed February 3, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable…

Wadsworth v. Wadsworth – 2022 UT App 5 – marital estate

January 17, 2022

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Business Interests, Business Valuation, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Causes, Divorce Costs, Divorce Court, Divorce Fears, Divorce Law, Divorce Lawyers, Divorce Mistakes, Divorce Preparedness, Divorce Procedure, Equity, Evidence, Expert Witnesses, Extramarital affairs/Adultery, Family Law, Finances, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Husband's or Wife's Business, Infidelity, Judges, Justice and Equity, Lawyer Fees, Legal System, Marital Debts, Marital Estate, Marital Home, Marital Property, Men's Divorce Issues, Modification of Alimony, Modification of Decree of Divorce, Personal Property, Procedure and Evidence, Property Division, Real Estate/Real Property, Spousal Support, Spouse's Business, Taxation, Utah Code, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Valuation, Women's Divorce Issues

appellate case, appellate decision, court of appeals, divorce law, family law, Utah Court of Appeals

2022 UT App 5 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS CANDI WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. GUY L. WADSWORTH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190106-CA No. 20200430-CA Filed January 13, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Su Chon No. 104904966 Michael D.…

T.W. v. S.A. – 2021 UT App 132 – child custody

January 14, 2022

Divorce Utah

Alimony and Support, Amicable Divorce, Annulment of Marriage, Antenuptial Agreements, Appeal, Assets/Debt/Property, Attorney Fees, Best Interest of the Child, Business Interests, Business Valuation, Child Abuse, Child Care Costs, Child Care/Surrogate Care, Child Custody, Child Custody Modification, Child Neglect, Child Protective Order, Child Protective Services, Child Support, Child Support Calculation, Child Support Enforcement, Child Support Modification, Children in Divorce, Civil Stalking, Civil Stalking Injunction, Co-parenting, Cohabitation, Common Law Marriage, Contempt of Court, Coping With Divorce, Court Orders, Court Rules, Custodial Interference, Custody, Custody Evaluation, Daycare, Debts, Dirty Tricks, Discovery, Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS), Division of Marital Property, Divorce, Divorce and Taxes, Divorce Attorneys, Divorce Causes, Fathers' Divorce Issues, Men's Divorce Issues, Mothers' Divorce Issues, Utah, Utah Court of Appeals Decisions, Utah Law, Women's Divorce Issues

appellate courts, child custody, child custody arrangement, child custody award, court decisions, custody, Utah Court of Appeals, Utah law

2021 UT App 132 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS T.W., Appellant, v. S.A., Appellee. Opinion No. 20200397-CA Filed November 26, 2021 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Dianna Gibson No. 134401457 David Pedrazas, Attorney for Appellant Laja K.…

Sanders v. Sanders – 2021 UT App 122

2021 UT App 122 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KRISTINE L. SANDERS, Appellee, v. TRAVIS JAMES SANDERS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200618-CA Filed November 12, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Todd M. Shaughnessy No. 014901182 Grace Acosta, Attorney for Appellant Steven M. Rogers,…

Fischer v. Fischer – 2021 UT App 145 – marital vs. separate property

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS GARY LEE FISCHER, Appellant, v. MELISSA KAY FISCHER, Appellee. Opinion No. 20200557-CA Filed December 30, 2021 Seventh District Court, Moab Department The Honorable Don Torgerson No. 184700047 Steve S. Christensen and Clinton R. Brimhall, Attorneys…

Tag: Utah Court of Appeals